By Oweyegha-Afunaduula
The former Presidents of Uganda, Apollo Milton Obote and Idi Amin, and their perennial successor, Tibuhaburwa Museveni, imposed themselves onto the citizens of Uganda. Apollo Miton Obote became leader of Uganda through a General Election in April 1962, in which he never presented himself to the electorate to be voted or not voted into power.
He was forced out of power both in 1971 and 1985 without ever giving the citizens of Uganda the right to either vote or not vote for him. It seems he loved elective politics so long as he was not a subject to the vote. In 1962 and 1980, he rose to the top job in the country simply by his party, the Uganda Peoples Congress (UPC), edging slightly ahead of the Democratic Party (DP) candidates (Ben Kiwanuka in 1962 and Paul Ssemogerere in 1980).
Although in 1962 he needed an alliance with Kabaka Yekka (King Only) Party of Buganda to capture the Premiership of Uganda from Ben Kiwanuka’s Democratic Party. The 22 Kabaka Yekka Members of Parliament from Buganda was a big boost that helped UPC to catapult Obote all the way to State House Entebbe.
Obote did not really get an opportunity to transit to Oboteism. He spent virtually his two reigns (1962-1971 and 1980-85) struggling for political legimacy in a much divided country. Between 1962 and 1971 it was Buganda hegemony that was testing his legitimacy to lead Uganda with Buganda as part of it (before independence Buganda had demanded independence from the British Colonial Government).
If Idi Amin had not intervened to depose Obote, most likely his evolving Common Man’s Charter would have been the embodiment of Oboteism: mixing socialism with democracy and social development of Uganda from bottom up. The Common Man’s Charter was thus an ideological document, which Obote submitted to his Political Party, forming a part of the country’s Move to the Left.
He asserted, in the document, several Key Principles of his Vision for Uganda, apparently including a commitment to democracy. The document was legislated in Parliament and signed into law on 24th October 1969 under the subtitle ” First Steps for Uganda to Move to the Left”.
Simultaneously, however, President Obote was increasingly relying on the army, commanded by Idi Amin, to rule. While he preserved the integrity of Parliament and the Judiciary to a certain extent, the former was being more attuned to underpinning his Vision for Uganda, although his social programme served the interests of the citizens in terms of quality education, quality health and quality agriculture.
There is no evidence, however, to suggest that when he recaptured the instruments of power following a much contested general election of 1980, he tried to revive the Common Man’s Charter in conformity with the law he signed before his overthrow to implement the Common Man’s Charter .
Resistance to his second reign by several rebel groups, almost immediately he assumed office, meant that he had no time to reintroduce the Common Man’s Charter, nor revitalize his social programme nor to carry out his Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Programme supported by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund under their Economic Recovery Programme for Uganda.
There were many human rights violations, but most of these could have been by his armed opponents trying to convince the people that Obote’s regime Government had no capacity to secure the security of their lives and property.
When Idi Amin overthrew Obote on 25th January 1971, he made it clear he would not entertain orthodox politics based on Parliamentary democracy when he said, “I am a professional soldier, not a politician”. That marked the end of Parliament as an arm of Government.
He, however, left the Judiciary to continue functioning, though within limits set by himself. When Chief Justice Ben Kiwanuka tried to work professionally to preserve the Judicially as an effective arm of Government in a militarized environment, he was eliminated and his body was never recovered.
The epitome of evolving Aminism was that he was the beginning and end of law and, for the most time, he ruled by decrees. Decrees are official orders that have force of law. So, it was Amin’s orders that the Judiciary had to preoccupy itself with to administer justice.
What, however, routinely emerged from the courts was injustice because Idi Amin would interfere with judicial processes in pursuit of his personal interests of power and control. Aspects of Aminism were: like an Executive with soldiers as Ministers, Supersonically rising extrajudicial killings, Total absence of political activities, Militarism as both a faith and practice of governance, Rising nepotism, kinship and ethnicity at the centre of leadership and governance, Suppression, repression and oppression, Institutionalized injustice nd Decay and collapse of institutions
He also had elements of human rights violations, Presidentialism, Kondoism (armed crime) and other crimes, Decay and collapse of social services (i.e. education, health, agriculture),Collapse of production and rising dependence of foreign handouts, Mafutamingi in business and trade, Collapse of cash crop economy and Xenophobia towards Indians.
In his book “Uganda’s Transition from Amin to Aminism: Exploring Yoweri Museveni’s Anglo-American backed dictatorships and the Fundamental Change that Never was”, published by Amazon in 2011, Kizito Michael George wrote this:
“When Museveni captured power in 1986 and promised Ugandans a fundamental change, many Ugandans were optimistic that the tyrannical days of dictators like Amin were over. After decades in power, according to Kizito Michael George, Uganda simply made a transition from Amin to Aminism.
In my view Aminism is indeed seen in what I have listed above. If we take Musevenism as the other side of Aminism then the list contains all the elements of Aminism. But we would have to remove Xenophobia towards Indians and Mafutamingi in business.
We would have to replace them with over-exaggerated affinity for Indians, Chinese and refugees. We would then have to add pseudo-military democracy (or politico-military democracy), election rigging, corruption scandals, primitive capital accumulation, and consummations of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary by the personal power of President Tibuhaburwa Museveni. According to Kizito Michael George (2011), Museveni (read Musevenism) was created by the Anglo-American Neoliberal Alliance.
This could explain why President Museveni has stuck to the falsehood of” Liberalized Economy”, and resisted intervening to or things right, even when it is clearly hurting the people, by insisting that the Market will solve the essentially social problems such as unemployment and hunger.
By this reasoning, the President sees the benefits of the liberal economy trickling down to the bottom of society and solving the social problems there. However,it is not easy to see how this will solve the rampaging land grabbers of largely one ethnicity, which is displacing and dispossessing indigenous Ugandans.
Just like the case if Castroism ( Albert Weisbord, 1962) in Cuba, Musevenism is proving to be a deadly danger to current and future Uganda. Fidel Castro attached himself from the top to the people who never sent him to the bushes of Latin America to fight for power, and essentially looked at them from the Mountain peak of his intellectual contempt. (Albert Weisbord, 1962).
To entrench himself in power, Castro ensured that the workers and the toilers were not entirely free to vote their choices and to participate actively in all government activities. This is what President Tibuhaburwa Museveni has adopted in Uganda. He even boasts every time there is an elections that “Nothing cannot be unless his Party (read Museveni) wills.
Museveni type revolutionists are very much like those that obtained in Cuba under Castroism with Upper-class leadership with purposely disorganized bottom of society, Reliance of a well-capitalized tiny conspirational military (Junta) initiative launched from the bushes of Luwero, Caudillism ( i.e., a system of sociopolitical domination based on the rule of a strongman who can decide and undecided anything with no regard to institutionalism or constitutionalism) and Personalized political power.
It also has Vague political statements of being for the people, yet maintaining “I don’t work for anybody but myself, family and grandchildren”, Forced industrialisation against native investments and driven for and with foreign investors, Separation of the sciences (Humanities, Social Science, Natural Science) in favor of Natural Science and pertinent professions, Overemohasis of military security at the expense of social security, Ever new military conspiracies in Uganda and East Africa and Hiding the social program behind liberalized economy and security.
It further has The President projecting himself as the only true and indispensable leader, Cliquism based on kinship and ethnicity, Numerous military promotions at the expense of others in other spheres of the economy, Creating soldiers as the new landlords of Uganda, Large public works such as hydropower dams, Cooption of politicians from Opposition other than completely opening up political space, Mushrooming impoverishment through economic schema such as Myooga, Operation Wealth Creation and Parish Development Model and Proliferating slavery within Uganda and beyond, mainly in the Middle East, with accompanying illicit trade in human organs.
Lastly it also has Mafias and deep State and It is clear that the revolution President Tibuhaburwa Museveni repeatedly talks about every other time and commemorates every year since 1986, at great expense to the taxpayer, does not include rethinking and liberating Ugandans from this spectrum of vices.
There is no indication the Vision the President says he has for Uganda includes liberating Ugandans from the Angli-American Neoliberal Alliance. With the recent revelations that Uganda is one huge landmass of minerals of all types, the country will sink further in the grip of the Anglo-American Neoliberal Alliance, perhaps with competition from Russia and China, which separately or collectively may want want to establish Uganda as their new sphere of influence.
The enormous indebtedness of the NRM Government to China may greatly distort future relations between Uganda and the outside world, particularly UK and USA, and perhaps within East Africa as well. Uganda Government gets most of its military gear from Russia and China, although the Anglo-American Neoliberal Alliance supplies some military hardware and money too.
One cardinal question remains: What is the future of Constitutionalism and Institutionalism in a Centralized Uganda under the influence of Musevenism.
For God and My Country
The writer is a Ugandan Scientist And Environmentalist.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this article are solely for and belong to the author/ writer. They don’t depict, reflect or represent Accord Communications Limited, it’s affiliates, owners or employees. If you have a story in your community or an opinion article, let’s publish it. Send us an email via editorial@accordconsults.com or WhatsApp +254797048150